Barbara Blog Interview – Controlling
What does a vintage bus have to do with controlling and MICE crisis management?
Not a thing—at least at first glance. But it was thanks to a vintage bus that Barbara Zimmermann and I met in Latvia in 2018. Her amazing vintage bus (http://oldtimerbus-mieten.eu) was impossible to miss! And our paths continued to cross throughout the trip. We saw one another at tourist attractions, where we’d give each other a quick nod or hello. Then we went our separate ways. Later, on the ferry from Liepaja to Travemünde, we actually got to know one another, quickly realizing how much we had in common, including the fact that we’re both systemic business coaches! And we’ve been corresponding regularly since then.
I’m thrilled to welcome Barbara Zimmermann to MICE crisis management meets, where she’ll focus on the topic of controlling.
You’ve been working with Fresenius Medical Care as a partner and financial controller since 2002. You also trained as a systemic coach. What’s the connection between systemic coaching and controlling?
Let’s start with coaching. In my opinion we can divide systemic coaching into two groups. In group A, we have people who want to change something about themselves: their behavior, their leadership capabilities, their conflict management skills, or their ability to present themselves with confidence. There’s no concrete goal. Instead, the people in this group want to learn how to help themselves. They want to be asked the right questions and to learn from experience so they can react and intervene effectively.
Meanwhile, the people in group B want a sparring partner to help them reach their goals. They’re looking for tips and information, and of course someone who listens to them. These people have a goal and want honest feedback in order to build confidence in their decision-making skills. And when we talk about goals, planning, and decision-making, we’re getting close to the responsibilities of a controller.
In the past, controllers were responsible delivered numbers. These days, and going forward, the expectation is for controllers to act as business partners, on par with management. Controllers deliver information in the form of KPIs, propose solutions to problems, and help business leadership reach their target goals. Both coaching and controlling always involve a task or a goal. Many business decisions often involve political or psychological factors—there again we have aspects that relate to coaching. Modern-day controllers also have to be facilitators. In other words, they have to ask the right questions and play a key role in shaping the path to success.
I associate the term controlling with the world of finance or business administration. What exactly is controlling and where does it apply?
Controlling is a fundamental part of business administration. It helps leadership and management steer and direct the company or the business unit.
Perhaps we can also categorize some controlling tools as precautionary measures. If I’m aware of my processes, my costs, my profitable products or even my loss-generating projects, then I can react quickly and make effective decisions as an entrepreneur.
For me, taking precautionary measures means paying attention to early warning signs, such as out-of-control costs, or employees who are frustrated or contribute little to the company.
If we ignore these early warning signs and there’s a shift in the market—for example, if a new competitor appears on the scene and offers the same product or service—then as entrepreneurs we need to have a handle on our numbers, processes, and profit margins.
In this day and age, controlling isn’t just about short-term tasks like putting together monthly financial figures, or issuing monthly financial statements as a tax accountant would. Besides being responsible for operational issues in the short-term, controllers also take on strategic tasks that have a long-term (3 to 10 year) impact. This is why the literature divides controlling into two categories: strategic and operational. Let me explain the difference…
Yes, what do you mean by the idea that controlling can be divided into strategic and operational categories?
There are even more categories, but these two are the best known. Strategic controlling, as the word suggests, is oriented toward the future development of the company. Where does the company want to be in 3 to 5 years, what new products and services do they want to add, where do they want to expand or cut back? How is the company positioning itself in the market? Where does it stand in relation to its competitors? What are the company’s strengths? Why are they offering this particular product or service, and how is it useful for customers? Are they acquiring new customers, and/or how can they increase satisfaction among their existing customers? What are the risks in the market, and in the company? What opportunities does the company’s leadership see? These are the types of questions involved in strategic controlling, which is all about ensuring the company’s long-standing survival.
In operational controlling the focus is on whether the company is making a profit, what’s going on with respect to liquidity, how much revenue each product/service generates, and what goals the company wants to achieve in the next 1 to 3 years. Traditionally, the company and each of its departments set goals, analyze discrepancies, and take action to get the company back on track or adjust estimates for the future. Generally speaking, the company prepares an overall 1 to 3-year budget that also includes subsidiary plans. However, every company is unique and has a different focus. Sometimes the focus is on liquidity. Other times, it’s about whether to contract out for a service or create it in-house, whether to develop new products, whether to expand and open new locations, or whether to set up cooperation agreements with other companies. The range of responsibilities is as extensive as it is exciting, and I believe companies should start to implement controlling measures from day one.
The idea that controlling can be used in areas like marketing is exciting to me. Can you describe how to apply a controlling process in a marketing context?
Depending on its size, a company can use controlling processes in all areas of operation (HR, sales, IT, purchasing, etc.). As I mentioned above, it’s about goals, actions and ultimately assessing whether the company reaches its targets and what corrective measures they want to take. In a marketing context, controlling traditionally centers around so-called sales promotion methods, such as advertising, customer care, market surveys, etc.
So we can measure things like the effectiveness of advertising campaigns, and whether new customers like new products or prefer those of the company’s competitors. We can use tools like customer surveys and offer new sales channels, such as online consultations. Marketing and sales are closely interrelated. In the best cases, companies periodically review their KPIs (which are self-defined) in the form of regular reports, and marketing teams develop action plans based on those key performance indicators.
Controlling also uses tools from crisis management. Do you use the term crisis management in controlling, or does it have another name, like process review?
Before a crisis occurs, there are usually a number of early warning indicators. If a company keeps these indicators on its radar, it can react before the situation reaches a crisis point. Larger companies have their own crisis management teams. They create codes of conduct for employees in the event of a crisis (e.g. a pandemic), drawing them up in advance and testing them regularly. Ideally, there’s a crisis team in place that can steer the company safely through a crisis.
But a pandemic doesn’t necessarily have to constitute a crisis for a company. There are other early warning indicators that can signal an impending crisis within a company.
Many of the risks companies face are predictable. They develop slowly and gradually.
According to a survey by the BDU (The Federal Association of German Management Consultants), these are some of the most common early warning indicators in the following areas of business operations:
- Finance: cash flow, liquidity, billing periods, return on sales
- Corporate strategy: dependence on customers, suppliers, employees, and capital investors; how knowledge is secured; how transfers of know-how are structured, how new products are developed
- Market, environment, industry: sales growth, customer payment habits, pricing compared to competitors, customer structure, changes in the social climate (e.g. shifts in values, climate protection)
- Performance management: acquisition and order processing, incoming orders, procurement
- Human resources management: sick leave rates, fluctuation rates, employee suggestions for improvement, age and gender structures
- IT: data protection, availability of IT systems
- Compliance: adherence to legal requirements as well as internal company regulations
- Security: prevention measures against cyberattacks
- Controlling isn’t just a tool for business management structures. We can apply it in many other contexts, too.
- Early warning systems are and remain essential in controlling as well as crisis management. Prevention is always better than aftercare!